Using behavior-based interviewing often results in extending a job offer to a marginal performer.

Excellent job skills means an applicant can do the job, however, it does not necessarily mean he or she will do it better than most everyone else.

Given enough time and hands-on interviewing experience, most interviewers will eventually learn how to correctly identify high achievers.

An applicant with great job skills will always out-perform a job applicant with lesser skill.

Research has determined that 'loving the work you do' plays a significant role in a person's motivation and ability to achieve superior results, yet few interviewers take this into consideration when making a hiring decision.

According to a Harvard Business School study, 76% of turnover can be traced back to poor interviewing practices and bad hiring decisions.

Historically, what percentage of managers have NEVER received any formal training on how to interview job applicants?

Most companies track turnover and know exactly how many of their best performing employees are exiting and why.

Using behavior-based interviewing is the most effective way to correctly assess an applicant's self-motivation.

When it comes to tracking hiring effectiveness, which one of these do most organizations NOT track?