Historically, what percentage of managers have NEVER received any formal training on how to interview job applicants?

If you see signs or hear examples of an applicant taking initiative, it's a reliable indicator the applicant is self-motivated.

Given enough time and hands-on interviewing experience, most interviewers will eventually learn how to correctly identify high achievers.

What is motivation-based interviewing?

What are the holes that exist in most employee selection processes that cause needless hiring mistakes? (multiple answers permitted)

Which statement is true about high achievers (people who achieve above-average results)?

An applicant's response to obstacles is considered to be one of the best predictors of their future job performance and success.

If an untrained interviewer uses an unstructured interview format (asks questions that pop into their head), the probability of hiring the best applicant is about 40% according to a Michigan State study.

Many managers who make hiring decisions are competent in their area of expertise but lack the proper interviewer training to know how to correctly identify applicants who will be 'High Performers' if hired.

Most unmotivated employees were great hires but they changed after they were hired due to poor management, unrealistic job expectations and/or unsatisfactory working conditions.