When it comes to tracking hiring effectiveness, which one of these do most organizations NOT track?

Most unmotivated employees were great hires but they changed after they were hired due to poor management, unrealistic job expectations and/or unsatisfactory working conditions.

Research has determined that 'loving the work you do' plays a significant role in a person's motivation and ability to achieve superior results, yet few interviewers take this into consideration when making a hiring decision.

The applicant with the best job skills will typically be...

Hiring managers commonly make the connection between an employee's poor performance issues and their own interviewing deficiencies.

If an untrained interviewer uses an unstructured interview format (asks questions that pop into their head), the probability of hiring the best applicant is about 40% according to a Michigan State study.

What are the holes that exist in most employee selection processes that cause needless hiring mistakes? (multiple answers permitted)

According to a recent CareerBuilder survey, two-thirds of American businesses have faced lower productivity and reduced employee morale due to a bad hire.

An applicant with great job skills will always out-perform a job applicant with lesser skill.

Excellent job skills means an applicant can do the job, however, it does not necessarily mean he or she will do it better than most everyone else.