An applicant with great job skills will always out-perform a job applicant with lesser skill.

Most companies track turnover and know exactly how many of their best performing employees are exiting and why.

If you see signs or hear examples of an applicant taking initiative, it's a reliable indicator the applicant is self-motivated.

When it comes to tracking hiring effectiveness, which one of these do most organizations NOT track?

Excellent job skills means an applicant can do the job, however, it does not necessarily mean he or she will do it better than most everyone else.

Most unmotivated employees were great hires but they changed after they were hired due to poor management, unrealistic job expectations and/or unsatisfactory working conditions.

According to a Harvard Business School study, 76% of turnover can be traced back to poor interviewing practices and bad hiring decisions.

An applicant's response to obstacles is considered to be one of the best predictors of their future job performance and success.

If an untrained interviewer uses an unstructured interview format (asks questions that pop into their head), the probability of hiring the best applicant is about 40% according to a Michigan State study.

Which of the following statements are true about motivation-based interviewing? (multiple answers permitted)