What are the holes that exist in most employee selection processes that cause needless hiring mistakes? (multiple answers permitted)

Most companies track turnover and know exactly how many of their best performing employees are exiting and why.

Given enough time and hands-on interviewing experience, most interviewers will eventually learn how to correctly identify high achievers.

When it comes to tracking hiring effectiveness, which one of these do most organizations NOT track?

Research has determined that 'loving the work you do' plays a significant role in a person's motivation and ability to achieve superior results, yet few interviewers take this into consideration when making a hiring decision.

According to a recent CareerBuilder survey, two-thirds of American businesses have faced lower productivity and reduced employee morale due to a bad hire.

If an untrained interviewer uses an unstructured interview format (asks questions that pop into their head), the probability of hiring the best applicant is about 40% according to a Michigan State study.

Most unmotivated employees were great hires but they changed after they were hired due to poor management, unrealistic job expectations and/or unsatisfactory working conditions.

Using behavior-based interviewing is the most effective way to correctly assess an applicant's self-motivation.

Behavior-based interview questions can give interviewers a false sense of confidence that they are gathering quality applicant information when they aren't.